Is the Tower of Babel still affecting us or something?

Edit:

We have 8 billion people, yet the best we could muster for the most total speakers of a language is under 2 billion, including non-natives…

  1. English (1,452 million speakers) First language: 372.9 million Total speakers: 1.4+ billion According to Ethnologue, English is the most-spoken language in the world including native and non-native speakers.

https://www.berlitz.com/blog/most-spoken-languages-world#:~:text=1.,English (1%2C452 million speakers)&text=According to Ethnologue%2C English is,native and non-native speakers.

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    For a tiny language, I really like toki pona, but it’s meant to be a minimal artistic language, more than an IAL (international auxiliary language).

    Last I checked tho, Globasa looks really interesting. The way that they add new vocabulary, and have a good representation of world languages, seems to work well.

    Esperanto is also good, but when my partner tried to learn it, they were weirded out by some of it’s quirks, like noun declinations based on whether it’s a subject or object, that seems unecessary.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah I feel that for better or worse Esperanto hasn’t reached a large enough mass to justify accepting its quirks and indo-eurocentrism, when we know we can do better now.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        For sure. A dissapointing number of IALs have nearly all their vocab from european languages, but there are a few that try earnestly to source their vocab from a wide set of language families. Any global initiative for an IAL needs to have a global vocabulary set to have any hopes of being introduced.

        • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          If you choose vocabulary that is culturally neutral, then that vocabulary is not easily recognisable.

          There’s no workaround for that trade-off.

          • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Recognizeable for whom, is the question. The majority of IALs to date have had a highly eurocentric vocabulary, so they can’t be recognizeable to even a plurality of the world.

            • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              Correct reasoning, incorrect facts.

              46% of the world speak Indo-European languages as a mother tongue.

              Can’t do better than that. No other option comes close.

              • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Aren’t you Irish? You know the English colonizers did their best to wipe out the Irish language and replace it with the one you’re advocating for right???

                  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    So why are you advocating for the displacement of the majority of the world’s language families based on european languages popularity it gained through colonial displacement?

                    The majority of the world don’t speak european languages.

                  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Kind of wild that you use Haiti as an example here, considering the european genocide of the Taino people, as well as the european importation of african slaves, two groups that didn’t speak european languages, and had their languages erased by the same process you’re advocating for.

    • mamotromico@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      When I was a teen I really wanted to learn Esperanto but never got around to it. Globasa seems extremely interesting though, maybe I’ll finally give one of these languages a try.

    • senloke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Esperanto is also good, but when my partner tried to learn it, they were weirded out by some of it’s quirks, like noun declinations based on whether it’s a subject or object, that seems unecessary.

      That sounds interesting. Esperanto has no noun-declinations, it’s an agglutinating language, you don’t bend words (= declination).

      But what is barely resembling that what you mention is the two cases of the language, which is nominative and the so called “accusative”. Which is adding -n to words to make them an object, depending on whether the verb of the sentence needs one or not. This case also is not just for objects, but also for directions, for measurements and time. That combination normally confuses the heck out of people.

      Which is why there is also an in-joke in the Esperanto community “don’t forget the accusative”, because people forget it or apply it too often.