What is your line in the sand?

  • Freewheel@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    First off, I’m an American. Born a stone’s throw from the location of one of the critical events in the history of the American revolution.

    To answer the question, no. Leaving aside the whole Republic versus democracy argument, my point of realization was when one party seized upon a minor technical issue and disenfranchised countless voters via lawsuit, sufficient to allow the race to be called in their favor.

    I’m sure there are many readers who believe I’m talking about 2016. For those readers, your keyword search is “hanging Chad”.

  • JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    still consider

    It has only two political parties, and a weird system where all votes are not equal and the actual vote majority doesn’t always win.

    It has frequently had multiple people from the same families running for office, and only wealthy people have a shot. Corporations get to lobby for laws in their favour.

    It also spies on its own citizens, holds people indefinitely without trial, has a huge prison population, a militarized police with a high homicide rate, and is the only western nation with the death penalty.

    Trump and Musk are laying bare how fragile the veneer of “democracy” really is in that country.

  • TXL@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    Absolutely not. A two party system was barely nominally a form of democracy. Current one quacks like a dictatorship and walks like a dictatorship. They might hold a fake election one day like many of those do, but still no.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      Firstly, the USA is obviously not a “dictatorship”. Come on, be serious. Words mean things.

      Second, America’s two-party system also has internal factions and primaries, many of them completely open (you don’t even need to declare allegiance to the party). The primaries are effectively the first round in a two-round electoral system (of which there are plenty in the world). The whole point is to create a binary choice in the final round. For some reason this always gets missed by otherwise informed observers. “There are only two parties” is just not a valid argument in this debate.

      Of course, none of these facts will be popular here, since the real point of this thread is to allow participants to performatively dump on the shared hate-object. Classic social media, I get it.

  • TeaWalker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Am Dutch. I have considered the US an incomplete democracy since I learned about voting in school. It’s not one person one vote, which to me is crucial for a democracy. The US right now is still a nation of laws, but democracy is sharply in decline. The voter-roll issues and Gerrymandering come to mind immediately. Not to mention the fact that guaranteed access to polls has been pulled by the courts. Which is insane to me.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Also president having so much power was clearly never democratic to begin with as we can see it all play out now.

      • RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        The power of the president did not start out like this. Congress kept giving their power to the executive for political reasons.

        It happened over centuries.

  • SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I don’t recognise the current American regime as a valid government. Just like I don’t recognise the Israeli occupation force as a valid state.

    It’s not remotely binding or even meaningful to anyone but myself of course. But hey, nothing matters these days.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    An American, but it never was a democracy. It’s always been a republic with a few democratic mechanisms.

    Which is good, IMO, or we would’ve gotten here much sooner. Populism is where democracies go to die, and the mechanisms of a representative republic help keep your average idiots from collectively voting us there.

  • Intergalactic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Absolutely not. A country where two parties are the only two viable electoral options, is absolutely not a democracy. Doesn’t mean I’ll stop my membership for the PSL.

  • sinnsykfinbart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I really never did, not a well functioning at least. They’ve practiced voter repression for decades, and then they had fun testing how low they could go after 9/11, doing a lot of unlawful shit, going after citizens who spoke out against their policies and wars.

  • DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    5 hours ago

    See, as a German, when I see a country go down the same route as the Weimar Republic after handing over the power to the Nazi party, I think it’s just very obvious. Hitler took some two months to completely destroy democracy, and the US are juuust in the middle of that. History doesn’t repeat, but sometimes it rhymes, and the similarities are just remarkable.

    So yeah, I guess that would be a big fat trench in the sand.

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    No. And I haven’t for a while now. Looking at your electoral system (electoral college, gerrymandering etc.), it probably never was but it was never as obvious as it is now.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I grew up in the US and have lived outside it for 10 years now. I would agree with this. Voting and representation have never been total and is definitely less available for many groups. Further things are being stripped away.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Yeah. My wake-up call was quite early in life, when SCOTUS handed the election to GWB. If I was born a generation earlier I’d have called it with Watergate. If I was an ancestor currently dead, I would have called it around the time an assassin put the presidency in the hands of the opposite party, and a drunk asshole subsequently decided reconstruction efforts should fail. Or possibly just prior, when we somehow decided not to hang every man Jack of the confederacy for treason.

      Edit: an earlier still version of me would have overseen the death of a culture brought on by poxy mad white religious extremists, and laughed ruefully to hear that centuries later the utter bastardy continues unchanged.