This one’s for JusticeforPorygon!

  • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A lion sized ant would asphyxiate rather quickly. Breathing through spiracles/tracheae doesn’t scale well.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      And the lions would quickly get too cold by having way too much surface area.

      Scientific accuracy is no fun for shrinking and growing things.

      • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The smallest mammal (Etruscan shrew) is about the same size as the largest ant (Driver ant Queen). You probably need to speed up the tiny-lion metabolism, but in general the mammal body plan can work around that size.

        On the other hand, to scale up insects to the size of a lion, you would need to completly redesign the respiratory at least and the entire exoskeleton construct will also be pushed to it’s structural limits.

        Downscaling mammals is much more realistic then upscaling arthropods.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah well… “giant” ants still aren’t lion sized. Or even cat size. Perhaps “oh wow that’s a big ant” big, but not actually that… big.

        The fossils indicate that the males grew up to 3 centimetres (1.2 in) and the queens grew to 7 centimetres (2.8 in). It had a wingspan of about 16 centimetres (6.3 in).[7][8]