Rivian CEO issues strong statement about people who purchase gas-powered cars: ‘Sort of like building a horse barn in 1910’::“I don’t think I would have believed it.”

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you knew that he was referring to the purchase of a $80k Suburban in 2030 would that change your assessment?

      • BromSwolligans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you know very well I would never engage with this possibility as a means of self preservation. Good day sir!

    • 3laws@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So a $77-82k Suburban is good in your eyes then? How come? Why? Oh wait, you didn’t read the quote.

      • Phrodo_00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just because he compared it to a suburban doesn’t mean that the Mitsubishi mirage and used Corollas aren’t a thing.

        And sure the Chevy Bolt is 26k, but that’s still 5k more expensive than a new Corolla and has like half the range, and you can fuel the Corolla way faster.

        • wtfeweguys@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not with the $7500 federal tax credit, let alone (for CA) residents the tax rebate. It’s not for everyone yet but there’s plenty of people there Bolt is perfect for.

          Source: bought one. Is great.

          • Blooper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Same. Bolt owner checking in. It’s fucking awesome and was - to me and my family- the obvious choice. It’s not for everyone, but if you can afford it and your lifestyle allows for it, it’s an easy decision.

            Slowly but surely EV’s will be the default choice. Prices will continue to fall, infrastructure will improve, and gas will get ridiculously expensive. The tide is changing.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whenever I see these razor thin LED headlights on vehicles, my first thought is are those COB chips getting cooled properly?

        It just comes across as very sus, a bit like form over function at the expense of headlight longevity

      • Illegal_Prime@dmv.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the fucking dangerous high front which is completely unnecessary on an electric car, why is it there. Not even the TESLA FUCKING CYBERTRUCK pulls that shit, say what you will about Tesla, but they understand how the differences between gas and electric cars can be taken advantage of.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Selling $80k electric cars and making comments like this is sort of like saying ‘let them eat cake’ in 1780

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you read the article you’d see that he said that in the context of buying a Chevy Suburban in 2030. Suburbans start at $77k, so I don’t think his comment is that out of line.

      • 3laws@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not, of course it’s not.

        But we know that legacy Reddit users never even bothered to read the articles anyway. Hurray! I missed-- not.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but it’s still a fair comment because the cars are too expensive for anyone to buy The battery compared to another car that’s too expensive to buy doesn’t really make any difference.

          Because the thing about expensive gas powered cars is there’s also not expensive gas powered cars. So he’s comparing expensive electric cars to variable price gas powered cars.

        • Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I usually dont bother to read articles, because they are seo garbage. I glance at top comments written by true people to verify info instead

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That context is great, but I haven’t seen any articles about the Chevy CEO saying such astoundingly tone deaf shit. 🤔 maybe the price isn’t what’s inflammatory.

  • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s important to read the full quote from Rivian’s CEO before complaining about $75k electric trucks:

    “I think the reality of buying a combustion-powered vehicle … is sort of like building a horse barn in 1910,” he said. “Imagine buying a Chevy Suburban in 2030 … what are you going to do with that … in 10 years?”

    He’s comparing buying a Rivian truck with buying a Suburban, which has a base price of $57k for the lowest tier configuration (LS) and a $76k price on the High Country configuration.

  • kaitco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Um…does the CEO know that horses are still a thing and that horse barns (aka stables) are still in use? Also, the invention of the automobile didn’t instantly displace the horse. It was well into the 1920s before they became a regular sight.

    Also…there’s lots of reasons to buy gas-powered cars these days. For one, not everyone lives in a home where they can install the necessary charger, so you’d always be on the “hunt” for charging stations, and fuel cars are generally cheaper at this time. Once we see the market flooded with EV cars, the prices will come down and fuel cars will no longer be the norm, but we’re likely a decade or more away from that.

    I get what the CEO is trying to say, but it’s still incredibly tone-deaf.

    • Throwaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also the recharge times are still a deal breaker for anyone who fancies a road trip every once in a while.

      • kalleboo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If your road trips are only once in a while, you easily make up for it in saved time not doing weekly fill-ups.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        What, you don’t like spending a quarter of your road trip waiting for “fuel”?

        • sky@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I spent under an hour charging on a 8 hour drive. I barely had time to pee or eat before the car was ready. Have you road-tripped an EV?

          • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            8 hour drive averaging 50mph(to be conservative and easy math) for 8 hours is 400 miles. What EV can go that far?

            Assuming you charged before you left

            Charged midway

            Charged when you got there

            You charged three times for an hour? Even not counting the first charge, you’ll absolutely need the last when you get there. That’s a min 2 hours charging for an 8 hour trip or about 25%.

            • sky@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              there’s a couple EVs that can go that far. I rented a Tesla Model Y Long Range, which cannot. I did not leave with a full charge and didn’t arrive with one either. You don’t need to.

              I charged 3 times on the way up the coast, for 15, 10, and 20 minutes. The last one was was only longer because I ran into target to get something.

              That’s… 9%.

              What car takes an hour to charge?? I used to have a Chevy Bolt, the slowest charging EV you can buy. and it didn’t take an hour.

              Go play around with A Better Route Planner if you want to see that assuming 3 hours of charging for an eight hour trip is ridiculous.

              Edit: 50mph on the highway is laughable, I was going 80-85mph. It’s a bit over a 500mi drive.

              • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                That makes sense. I forgot they charge a lot faster when low and assumed a full charge. I’ve only ever driven a Tesla model 3 once on a business trip. Mostly city driving so no long trips.

          • Throwaway@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, I don’t have 80k to spend on a “maybe I won’t be too worse off”

            • sky@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              it was a rental car lol

              though you’d be surprised to learn there’s EVs under $80k! not that anyone can afford new cars anyway.

              • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                1 year ago

                I bought a used Leaf for $11K about 5 years ago. Best car purchase I’ve ever made. I still have a ICE vehicle for road trips, but man do I like the way electric engines produce power!

                • sky@leminal.space
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Used EVs can be a great deal! I’ve had my eyes out for a good deal on a leaf for ages, but not many pop up in my rural area.

              • Petter1@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I can very much recommend a dacia spring. I think this is one of the most affordable way of transportation. But I live in Switzerland, we have a great charging network and our distances aren’t to far. After paying 5500 CHF upfront, i pay monthly 200 CHF for power and leasing fee (170 + 30). After 3 years I can buy it for 10000 CHF or just give it back. Buying the car directly is about 20000 CHF. Just make sure that you order fast charging as well.

            • spongebue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              My Chevy Bolt cost less than half that, and that was new with most of the bells and whistles. I drove over 200 miles on a single charge yesterday. Longer road trips are doable with a tiny bit of planning and multitasking. When you’re charging, do all the things you do on a road trip anyway: take a leak, grab a snack, give your mind a quick break.

              My car is also the 2nd worst major EV for road trips (after the Nissan Leaf). The Volkswagen ID.4, for example, is a little more than half your $80K number and charges about 2-3x faster than the Bolt.

              It’s also pretty awesome to not have to go to gas stations as part of your ~weekly routine because you charge at home and it costs next to nothing.

  • generalpotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What he actually meant to say was:

    “I’ve got my head so far up my ass that I think everybody should be spending $100k+ on a truck regardless of their need or financial circumstances. I’m also incapable of doing my job, which is why my company can’t produce enough units, even though it’s largely a solved supply chain problem. This is how I cope with my shitty existence on this planet.”

  • CaptFeather@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just looked up the price for a Rivian truck and holy shit is this guy for real? Lmao. Just another out of touch CEO virtue signaling. If he really felt this way he would make them affordable lol

  • T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    CEO of an electric car company recommends that people drive electric cars.

    Doesn’t really seem like much of a headline.

    The statement might be more significant if it was a CEO of a car company that made diesel/petrol cars who said it.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s more the tone deafness. Most people couldn’t afford either a car or a horse barn in 1910 just like most people (in America anyway) can’t afford an electric car.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How to tell the entire world that you’re rich and entitled.

    Have you seen the price of electric cars it’s ridiculous. No way I can afford one.

    Also never mind the fact I have no way of charging it because I only have access to on-street parking. If they really wanted to help they should bring down the cost of their massively overpriced vehicles and also invest in distributing charging points around the country.

    Isn’t the ultimate plan supposed to be that they’ll be at least one charging point and every highway at least every 8 mi?

    • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It depends where you are and what market segment you’re looking in. In NZ you can buy a fully electric MG ZS EV (7 year warranty) for almost the same price as a base model Toyota Camry.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A new Renault Zoe is about 23 000€, which has a driving range of about 400km. Second hand they go for about 10 000€.

      Yeah, there are many luxury EV brands, but those aren’t the only ones existing.

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well maybe if this guy sold an electric car that people could afford, they would buy it

    • niisyth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Startup costs need to be softened with a costlier higher margin vehicle. Cannot achieve quality mass production of cars from thin air.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right but don’t make vulgar statements about how fabulous you are, and how stupid everyone else is but not buying your fabulous expensive car that’s fabulous and expensive, but that’s fine because you’re a startup.

        • niisyth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The comment is taken out of context if you’d maybe read the article. It’s a comparison between a Suburban and Rivian who are in the same bracket.

  • Geek_King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Please pay for my apartment complex to install charger plugs in our garages then.

    I’m totally onboard with EV’s, I just can’t have one right now.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you just have a regular plug in the garage, it works. I thought that I would have to get a special outlet put in, but after plugging in at night for a couple months I realized there was no need. Figure about 5 miles per hour recharge. I have an older used Leaf that was relatively cheap.

      • Geek_King@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t have any electrical plugs in my garage. The best I can do is commandeering a 60 watt bulb socket with one of those adapters that turns it into a socket. Also, I don’t think the apartment complex is rigged up to charge tenants for the cost of running that bulb and garage door opening either. So they probably would be pissed if I started charging a full EV in there.

        • 3laws@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          They won’t even notice. Unless you live in an electric supply desert, charging an EV 0-100% is ridiculously cheap.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, so, how much is one of those Rivian trucks, exactly?

    $73,000?

    Yeah, fuck off. That’s more than the median annual gross income for American workers. It’s all good and well to tout a slightly more sustainable form of transportation–still not nearly as sustainable as busses or trains!–but when you’re pricing it well outside what most people can rationally afford, you’re not helping the situation.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Average transaction price for a new vehicle in the U.S. is already at $48k. Plenty of electric models are below the average price by now.

      The fact is, if you’re considering buying a new car, you’re already on the richer side. So this message is mainly aimed at those richer Americans considering a $73,000 F-150, that they might want to consider a $73,000 Rivian instead.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      All these products have to come to market in order for prices to eventually come down. People need to see that they have viable options to gasoline cars.

      In Norway, more than 80 percent of new cars sold are electric. There are many other options that don’t cost $73,000. Rivian is just one option.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        IIRC, Norway also offered substantial tax incentives to people that bought electric cars. IIRC, the fed. gov’t did the same in the US, and car companies responded by raising prices by the amount of the incentive.

      • 2ncs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s true but you have to consider how much of the car market is made up of used cars. When I was last shopping for cars (4 years ago) there were hardly any EVs in my budget and the ones that were, were 10 year old Priuses. Most people frankly don’t have the income to buy anything more than a gas car. (Market for EVs may have changed since my experience). The way I see it is the CEO is making a good point while also shitting on poor people.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The first response from Google shows me several late model used Nissan Leafs for around $15k. Those didn’t have much range but plenty for most people’s day to day

            • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I believe that from his comment (“what are you going to do with that in 10 years”), he was implying buying new cars. I see nothing odd in buying used ICE cars, but I wouldn’t dish out for a new one at this point.

              Now if you buy a used car for 10k now, you’ll probably have a harder time getting value out of it in 10 years vs. EV.

            • MumboJumbo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not only the cost, but there’s also the issue of infrastructure. I as well as many others in my city don’t have a garage and park either on the street or on a parking pad in the alley. I wouldn’t imagine a power cord running to a vehicle lasting very long because of the scrap prices of copper. We’ve got a long ways to go.

  • NebLem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    A giant electric “luxury” truck is still a giant “luxury” truck. Buying one over the other is like buying a cruelty free synthetic beaver cap over a cap made from an actual beaver. Yes it probably is better, but you are still wearing an ass on your head.

    It’s 2023, most people live in urbanized areas where a truck is similarly ridiculous, especially the modern “luxury” models. Those that actually use their vehicles for hauling things at a farm want real work trucks and tractors (regardless of engine type) with lower and longer beds.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I buy what my meager wage allows me to afford…

    Make an EV that competes on price with a Corolla and I’ll be there.

    • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Even then. My Corolla cost under $15k brand new off the lot. It’s not the base model either. The base model for the 23 Corolla is almost $22k. Car prices are insane.

      • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only new car still sold in the US for under $20k is the Mitsubishi Mirage, and even that model will likely be phased out in the next few years. I also wouldn’t recommend buying one, as, speaking from experience, it tends to roll over in a slight breeze.

        • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Weird, I’ve had one for years and it hasn’t flipped over once.

          20k is way too much for one, but I bought mine new for 14k. It’s an economy car, not a Mercedes, not a sports car. And they’re 100% better if you get one with a manual transmission.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      still use plenty of fossil fuels from coal plants

      This is disingenuous as fuck and you know it. Updates to the grid are by far the most effective means of limiting carbon release. Tying engines to the grid maximizes gains in solar, wind, etc that not doing so does not.

      There is no serious plan for climate change mitigation that does not involve EVs.

      • MonkRome@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I own a gasoline car. I was being too flippant. I would point out that our car centric culture is inefficient no matter how you swing it. I agree it’s a part of solving climate change, but cars of any type are still a problem, we need to massively overhaul our urban transit and get away from cars in urban areas.

        In the end all transit only accounts for 15% of the overall problem. Our spread out infrastructure caused by car convenience has many other negative externalities though, like the increased need to maintain more roads, electric loss over longer distribution, heating and cooling in large single family homes made possible by cars bringing you to your job while living way out in the suburbs (arguably way more serious than the cars themselves), etc. The suburban experiment was an environmental disaster, and I say this as someone that lives in a large house in the suburbs currently pumping out AC, so I’m not judging.

        But plugging in your personal tank isn’t really solving the problem. It’s just ignoring it. Cars are the problem no matter the fuel source, because of the impact they have had on how we spread out and grow our consumption… We need multi use zoning, dozens of train lines in every city, bike infrastructure, work at home, massive reduction in fossil fuel based power plants… A reordering of society around alternatives to spreading out, a massive worldwide effort of urban densification. As well as a massive effort to hold corporations accountable for their energy use as well. That and we need to stop having so many fucking kids, the world can’t support this level of consumption forever.

      • Pohl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not disingenuous. True. Grid power is still dirty so electric cars are still dirty. Probably about a 50% improvement in carbon emissions based on the most common fuel mix in the US for an e car.

        Clean transportation by car is a luxury that we do not yet have.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t engineer for what you currently have. You engineer for where you want to be.

          Renewable energy is the fastest growing segment of the energy market by a mile, growing exponentially.

          I don’t have my numbers at hand, but renewables account for something like 80+% of new energy growth in the US.

          • Pohl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes. The OP is about how TODAY it is silly to use ICE. Today it is silly to pretend that electric cars are clean. They will be at some point. At that point, I will agree with the obnoxious CEO from the article. Today, he is wrong, very heavy (7-8k lbs) coal powered trucks are not clean.

            Make them smaller!

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Purchasing EVs sends price signals. Big trucks are in demand, and it’s easier to cater to demand than shape demand when you’re an emerging market.

              • Pohl@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Seriously the epa doesn’t even bother to rate mpg in vehicles that approach rivian weight. An f250 probably gets a combined 15mpg. It weights 6k lbs vs the rivians 7k. if your only seeing a 50% cut in emissions with the switch to electric. A rivian truck is pretty much the same as an ICE car that gets around 30 combined.

                There are a million reasons that drive them to make these monsters. But the climate isn’t one. I don’t care about the market forces. I care about cutting CO2 emissions. These vehicles do not help that mission today. The CEO is wrong. His vehicles don’t make sense TODAY except as a luxury product for rich people to signal their virtue. That’s it.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t care about market forces

                  Then you are not serious about impacting climate change.

    • ilmagico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The rivian truck (I call it “froggy”) is actually a pretty small pickup truck, by american standard … have you seen a F150? (including the electric “lightning” version)?

    • SMITHandWESSON@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      in before, “but I need my enormous vehicle because once every 13 years I haul 3 2x4’s and am too dumb to use a roof rack or rent a truck for the day!”

      I win!!!

      My enormous eletric vehicle (plug-in Rav4) is powered from my home solar panel system, and I use it to transport my dogs to the park a couple of times a week.

      I’m completely guilt free!!!😃

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even a subcompact automobile takes up an entire traffic lane and an entire parking space, and providing such spaces is what ruins cities.

      The future is designing our cities for walking, biking and transit, not replacing our disastrous car sewers of gasoline cars with disastrous car sewers of electric cars.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Buying any car, electric or otherwise, is 'Sort of like building a horse barn in 1910’.

    Real sustainability comes from changing the zoning code to cease outlawing walkability.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I have absolutely no idea how it would be possible in a rural area or a car centric city. I guess it wouldn’t be, and the people in charge are not willing to change.

        I live in a car-centric city, and am relatively civically engaged. Speaking from personal experience, for most of the people in charge, it’s not that they’re unwilling to change; it’s that they’re so indoctrinated from having grown up in American car-centricity that they don’t understand the problem or the alternatives enough to realize that there’s anything to change to. They’re like the people in this thread, who think “infrastructure” means things like adding EV chargers to suburban-sprawl parking lots or trying to get public transit to serve neighborhoods of single-family houses. They have no comprehension of the scope of the problem, which is that the Suburban Experiment is a failure and that the geometry of low-density, car-centric development makes it unsustainable, unaffordable, and unhealthy, regardless of how you power the cars.

        Even when they support things like transit-oriented development or abolishing minimum parking requirements, they tend to think it’s the exception to be implemented in certain areas instead of realizing that it needs to be the default way we do things now.

    • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would barely scratch the surface, I’m afraid. For quite a lot of America, not owning a car is simply not feasible. I don’t have a large friend/family group, but in 4 cases now, we’ve had to relocate our families a town over because wages aren’t keeping up with cost of living. So we all have long commutes now. There are no buses, trains, etc. We were priced out of housing market. When my landlord sold the property and forced my move 5-6 years ago, I could rent and pay 30% more for a smaller place, I could buy for what I was paying if I wanted to move my family of 5 into a two bed with no yard, etc, or I could move a town or two over pay a bit more, and get a decent size house for my family. Today if I had to buy a house, I couldn’t even come close to affording the place I live in now, especially not at 7-9% interest compared to the 3.5% I got.

      Now I guess you could still say fuck me I should have given up my dogs, moved my family into a shoe box and just walked to save the planet, but even then that’s not really feasible. In a town of 60k I moved from, there is only bussing, and even then they don’t run often enough to a wide enough range of places that you’re not building in additional hours of the day to get where you’re going. And they often don’t run past 7pm or before 7am. And that’s most of America. Even in large cities, public transportation is severely lacking compared to the rest of the civilized world.

      Biking in the US should also help be a stopgap, but our whole society is so fucking car centric even that’s even not really feasible. Aside from the fact that most of infrastructure rarely has bike lanes or even places to store bikes, its still lacking severely from “I’m just going a few blocks over to the bodega” every few days and is more like “just 5-10 miles to the grocery store.” And this is just looking at my tiny little town where I live that is nowhere near as bad as somewhere like Houston, which is far more populous and also even less dense and less traversable by anything that’s not a car.

      In 2023, saying people shouldn’t own cars is either ignorant of the issues around it or just classist. The Rivian CEO saying shit like this, with a starting price of $73k, is just more classist CEO bullshit. We don’t even have the charging infrastructure at the moment to support everyone buying electric, not to mention I’d be willing to bet that 50% or more of this country can’t even afford the starting price on whatever the cheapest electric is.

      • nbafantest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Real sustainability comes from changing the zoning code to cease outlawing walkability.

        Reply:

        For quite a lot of America, not owning a car is simply not feasible

        WHY IS IT NOT FEASIBLE WHOFEARSTHENIGHT? IS IT BECAUSE OF ZONING? ITS BECAUSE OF ZONING ISNT IT

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Buying any car, electric or otherwise, is 'Sort of like building a horse barn in 1910’.

      Let’s say that it depend on where you live. In a big city maybe a car can be useless (or less usefull), but in a small town like mine a car is basically the only way to move around since public transportation is really limited.

      Real sustainability comes from changing the zoning code to cease outlawing walkability.

      Even if you remove all the private cars in a city, you will discover that you will substitute almost all of them with small/medium trucks to deliver all the groceries/products you (end everyone else) need in your life. And I say it living in a small town where I can almost do the day by day chores without using a car.

      • puffy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A single delivery truck carries 100-200 packages, if everyone drives to the store instead, you’d have 100+ cars on the road. There is a huge difference.

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am not sure that there would be a so huge difference, especially outside some big cities and especially if you add also the public transportation to the game.

          But maybe I am wrong.

          • nbafantest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It would be quite large. The vehicles per household would decrease to about 1 instead of over 2.