• uzay@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    7 months ago

    The difference being that on wikipedia you could use the sources on there while AI makes those up as well

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      A more important reason is teachers let you use Wikipedia sources, while even valid ai content is “not your work”

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 months ago

        I remember an AI that wrote a legal motion and justified its arguments by citing cases it made up.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I mean, of course. For the record, that wasn’t the type that cites its sources intrinsically as part of its response creation process, although it wouldn’t be immune to hallucinations even if it was.