Pretty much in the title. Maybe you wouldn’t even use it, but would like to simply see it exist for the sake of having a federated alternative.

For me, it’d be the following:

  • LinkedIn
  • Meetup
  • Tiktok

I am on the first two, but would prefer a federated alternative. I’m not on Tiktok, but would like to see a federated alternative.

I’ll admit these might not be a good idea. But as a thought experiment, I’d be curious about the community weigh in on what you all think this might look like.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s not technically possible.

    You could have one instance offer more than one platform, though, and you can already use multiple frontends with whatever instance you’re on. Kbin, which you’re on, actually tries to do the Swiss army knife thing IIRC.

    • danhakimi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can log into a pixelfed app on android with a mastodon account. Why can’t you log into a pixelfed web frontend with a mastodon account? What law of physics makes that impossible?

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Uhh, let’s see…

        After a search, it seems like they actually just copy the settings from your Mastodon account. It’s still a separate account. I’ll keep checking in case I missed something.

        It doesn’t even sound like they securely bring over the password, which presents a little bit of a phishing threat if people are re-entering their Mastodon password into third party apps like this one.

        Edit: Yup, here’s a video/gif. I’d do a federated link but I’m not sure Lemmy supports that yet.

        You could totally copy someone else’s Mastodon this way, so that’s fun.

        • danhakimi@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          alright, well that’s not great, but my point is more that we could update the protocol to allow this to be done securely and conveniently.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            It would still be a separate account, but yes, seamless migration to a new instance could be a thing. There’s scripts for it already. OPs suggestion that you can just move between instances with the same account isn’t how the fediverse works.

            If you just want to been on Pixelfed and Mastodon, your instance giving access to both would be the cleanest, best way.

            • danhakimi@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              OPs suggestion that you can just move between instances with the same account isn’t how the fediverse works.

              I’m OP.

              I’m not sure why you’re speaking in the present tense about a suggestion I am making for the future.

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Ah, sorry. Didn’t notice, there’s a few people talking to me.

                Yes, it’s not a thing that could work. If you had some centralised way to handle accounts it wouldn’t be federated anymore. It would be another (semi-)walled garden or some kind of blockchain-ish thing, but either way it wouldn’t be ActivityPub-complient.

                • danhakimi@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  If you had some centralised way to handle accounts it wouldn’t be federated anymore.

                  So why can’t you have some federated way to handle accounts?

                  but either way it wouldn’t be ActivityPub-complient.

                  Unless you changed activitypub, right?

                  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    What does that mean? When you post, who’s server’s outbox do you post from? Inboxes and outboxes by server are a central part of the standard.

                    You can copy over a user, and make another similar account (like pixelfed), or you can do stuff on that server from another federated server, but at the end of the day you’re not on the same account on different servers.

                    Unless you changed activitypub, right?

                    Sure. It’d be a pretty huge departure, though. To a weird degree, like Coca-Cola leaving the beverage business becoming a tire company.

                    If you wanted to make a new protocol, you could go beyond federation and have a fully decentralised system where everything happens on arbitrarily many servers in parallel, but that would be a lot of work and probably data-heavy before any users walk through the door.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s entirely technically possible. Apps already use third party identity providers all the time, you just need federated apps to support OAuth both for signing in on the client and as a backend identity provider, and standardize how federated apps return user info that would be common to any federated app (usernames, saved / liked posts, subscribed feeds, stuff common to the ActivityPub spec).

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You could use the same credentials to open a new account on another instance, sure, I guess. You still have to create another user on the new platform with their own ActivityPub inbox and so on.

        I guess to a non-technical user that might seem like the same thing, but then again so would your home instance allowing you to view other platforms. The second one would be way cleaner and easier on instance maintainers.