I get meta evil, but aren’t we just blocking out any users from accessing the wider fediverse?

  • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think ActivityPub’s license should prohibit financially profiting from the platform.

    EDIT: I mean “should be changed to”

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Really? So Linus Torvalds could make Linux proprietary all the sudden? I’m skeptical. And it’s going to vary by jurisdiction too.

          • dartos@reddthat.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well yeah he could, but he can’t retroactively apply that license change, so the Linux foundation would just keep rolling on with their own fork.

              • dartos@reddthat.comOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I was talking about Linux specifically because it’s under the GPL license. Threads isn’t open source at all afaik, so it doesn’t really apply