• blindsight@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I like base 12 a lot, but Reverse Polish Notation is a mess when you get up to working with polynomials.

    With polynomials, you’re moving around terms on either side of an equation, and you combine positive terms and negative terms. In essence, there’s no such thing as subtraction. (Similarly, division is a lie; you’re actually just working with numerators and denominators.)

    Reverse Polish Notation makes that a mess since it separates the sign from its term.

    Also, RPN draws a distinction between negative values and subtraction, but conceptually there is no subtraction with polynomials, it’s all just negative terms. (Or negating a polynomial to get its additive inverse.)

    But, yeah. It’s a shame we don’t use base 12 more.

    • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s super interesting. I adore RPN on caclulators and had never heard any drawbacks well-articulated.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        RPN is a great way to type things into computers – it’s easier for the computer to parse, too – but it kind of sucks for writing abstract math.