Mee@reddthat.com to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-21 day agoWhat did Cory Booker 25-Hour speech actually achieve in terms of change?message-squaremessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1102arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up191arrow-down1message-squareWhat did Cory Booker 25-Hour speech actually achieve in terms of change?Mee@reddthat.com to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-21 day agomessage-square54fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down4·24 hours agothey elected oz in the very next session; using a filibuster to prevent his confirmation is how you use a filibuster effectively.
minus-squareBophades@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down5·edit-219 hours agodeleted by creator
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·23 hours agothe same way thurmond did it; you secure the votes behinds the scenes and then throw a filibuster when it’s time to vote to turn up the pain; not when there’s nothing on the table and no one around like booker did it.
minus-squareBophades@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-219 hours agodeleted by creator
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·20 hours agoThey shook hands and unanimously approved (booker too) more weapons for the genocide immediately after the performance.
they elected oz in the very next session; using a filibuster to prevent his confirmation is how you use a filibuster effectively.
deleted by creator
the same way thurmond did it; you secure the votes behinds the scenes and then throw a filibuster when it’s time to vote to turn up the pain; not when there’s nothing on the table and no one around like booker did it.
deleted by creator
They shook hands and unanimously approved (booker too) more weapons for the genocide immediately after the performance.