• thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    there is an official self hosted bitwarden server. It doesn’t support SSO, I guess time will tell if it supports this.

    • Contend6248@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s bare minimum, not even 2FA is working without a premium account.

      I was shocked how much more Vaultwarden is providing for free.

      • Traister101@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean Bitwarden wants to make money. 10$ a year to not have to mess about with self hosting (however beneficial that might be) is a pretty good deal.

        • Contend6248@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, to each their own, half an hour of setup is something i can do myself. Centralized password safes aren’t my favorite thing.

          I just think that 2FA is such a must have feature, that it’s weird to put it behind a paywall, all that password-, file- or text-sharing or now passkeys are nice to have and should be paid.

          • asudox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They probably put 2FA behind a paywall because nobody in their right mind would actually want to store 2FA and their passwords behind one account in the same storage. I suppose you can see the problem.