• Contend6248@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s bare minimum, not even 2FA is working without a premium account.

    I was shocked how much more Vaultwarden is providing for free.

    • Traister101@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean Bitwarden wants to make money. 10$ a year to not have to mess about with self hosting (however beneficial that might be) is a pretty good deal.

      • Contend6248@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, to each their own, half an hour of setup is something i can do myself. Centralized password safes aren’t my favorite thing.

        I just think that 2FA is such a must have feature, that it’s weird to put it behind a paywall, all that password-, file- or text-sharing or now passkeys are nice to have and should be paid.

        • asudox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They probably put 2FA behind a paywall because nobody in their right mind would actually want to store 2FA and their passwords behind one account in the same storage. I suppose you can see the problem.