Yes, and this is generally how it works:
P.S. If you are doing this correctly and with an open mind, there’s actually a good chance you might change your opinions on a some things, and that’s okay (as long as they aren’t harmful). It also can show them by example that opinions are flexible and should be based on evidence, not the other way around.
Which is why direct confrontation is always a bad idea. You basically have to guide them into coming to the correct conclusion on their own without overtly trying to convince them.
What a legend. The significance of NTP cannot be understated overstated. The internet as we know it could not work without it.
For your use case, building from source might be more practical.
Why the hell do you only have 8GB? Are you trying to install flatpaks on a smart fridge?
Anger has a way of adding a few zeros.
The fact that Facebook still exists is proof of this.
Do you play exclusively esports games or something? It’s rare I encounter a title that doesn’t work just fine on Linux. It seems I barely need to tweak any settings anymore.
I also prefer a desktop, but I’m not an elitist and I recognize the majority of people, especially younger people, consume a significant amount (if not a majority) of content on their phones.
Just gotta shout dialup noises.
You used to ignore the phone to browse the internet on a computer.
Now you ignore the computer to browse the internet on your phone.
This is the best answer. In 2025, CPUs are extremely complex. There are so many ways to measure a CPU’s performance now, a spec sheet isn’t going to tell you which one is faster (even if you’re very educated in this stuff).
At the end of the day, what matters is: How well can the CPU perform the tasks you need it to?
This means, look at benchmarks that closely resemble the types of tasks (rendering, code compiling, gaming, etc) that you’d want to use the CPU for. Different CPUs often come out on top depending on the type of workload, so find the one that best does what you need it to do.
For those that didn’t read the paper, they are literally attempting to calculate the monetary value of top open source projects.
We first estimate the supply-side value by calculating the cost to recreate the most widely used OSS once. We then calculate the demand- side value based on a replacement value for each firm that uses the software and would need to build it internally if OSS did not exist. We estimate the supply-side value of widely-used OSS is $4.15 billion, but that the demand-side value is much larger at $8.8 trillion. We find that firms would need to spend 3.5 times more on software than they currently do if OSS did not exist.
This is the huge takeaway for me. Open Source saves companies and organizations so much money because it allows them to not have to make that component themselves. Having open standards literally saves the economy trillions of dollars not having to “reinvent the wheel”.
I learned to love Earl Grey organically, but I do like that Picard loves it too.
This checks a lot of boxes for a collaborative notes app for the family, though I don’t see any mention of clients, so I’m assuming it’s just a web app at the moment?
Good for them. The gaming industry has needed better worker protections for decades. Healthier developers are more creative developers.