you would have received more relevant responses if you had titled your post as, “there is absolutely no evidence that musk is against free speech. what are you folks on about, anyway?”
you would have received more relevant responses if you had titled your post as, “there is absolutely no evidence that musk is against free speech. what are you folks on about, anyway?”
even the strongest amongst us would quail
on hearing the specifics of every such tale.
one would be ever so inclined
to declare that the worst of mankind
lives today in that state of israel.
that’s strangely motivating, that monkey keeping its eyes on the prize no matter what pitfalls it encounters.
good on you, mate.
solving global warming is really simple: kill off all human beings.
i wonder how long ai algorithms will take to figure that out.
this article is a load of bollocks;
i really love my smart idiot box!
but wait, this may sound bad,
we interrupt this limerick for an ad –
have you thought of switching to our socks?
one might say that this piece of news is the… canary… in the coal mine?
thos video breaks maths. parallel strokes leading to a purr-pendicular outcome?
why would any of google’s customers pay to stuff its ads into such a broken feature?
it’s like embossing your logo within a toilet bowl – sure, a lot of people will get to see it but mostly only when it’s submerged in shit.
it’s the photographer that’s upside down. that’s obviously a prime example of an Atlas cat.
pair o’ not-normals.
youtube bermudas.
or build in a return-to-factory-by-yourself feature into them.
topologically, though, isn’t that just the same as all speaking and listening? it’s all mouth to ear.
if anything, force-fitting 69 seems unduly contrived. like if you shake someone by the hand, the top of your palm 69’s the bottom of theirs. or if you give them a high-five, it’s the forefinger and pinky.
or if you respond to this comment, we’ll be 69ing each other’s eyes with our fingers.
i’d hate to see what’s “snow white” in this version.
conjecture: maybe autocorrect once got hold of “bugger” and things kind of evolved from there?
how would you feel about an article titled,
“This” word in article titles infuriates internet readers
do take the time to read the full article. particularly the section titled “LASIK vs. Reading Glasses”.
separately, my cohorts and I are in the mid-40s and have undergone LASIK evaluation. the unanimous consensus given each of us is that we will have to undergo the procedure again and again as our eyes age. that we will have to fall back on glasses.
i speak from personal experience on this topic.
LASIK procedures are “permanent”, at best, till the patient’s mid-40s. one source.
Pay once or pay multiple times a year?
no glasses wearers pay “multiple times a year” for new spectacles and lenses. the frequency does go up to once in two years or once a year after the mid-40s because of presbyopia, but that expense would be incurred anyway whether one gets a LASIK procedure done or not.
especially since just reading the headline made me cry.
“ceo of cloud company says employees must work on premise.”
must do wonders for the marketing of the capability of their platform.