commendable, but why would you need ro run anything but emacs inside of emacs?

Developers license is free, but in general yes, you need to pay for rhel (worth it).

Turkey is up there in the fucked upparts of the world to be honest, not sure about stability, even less sure about futire of NATO, long-standing territorial and cultural clashes with like every neighbour except those that are on the other side of the sea?

Anyway what kind of use is allowed? Is this agricultural only or you can do whatever? How large is it? Do you have water, electricity connection?

That’s like the most correct one if there even could be a ‘correct’ way to pronounce a word of foreign origin in most languages.

So how do you pronounce it?

ken-tavr, I think that’s similar to how it pronounced in a lot of languges around here, it’s also pretty similar how original greeks did it (kένταυροι)

Trumpists and followers of Trump will understand much better what Russia is, who Putin is, and the motivation of our politics

🥴

Yeah trowing around soulless label is horrible abuse in a joke post with a screenshot from 4chan.

You don’t need some tragic family background to be soulless creature wearing human costume.

those are different b. 🙃 One is megabits per second and other is megabytes per second.

They literally just laid there half a year, doing nothing. /s

Also they needed to pay rent, taxes, tithe, weren’t able to freely move or change profession, and were just step above slaves. Truly a life of leisure.

From late antiquity to high middle ages popes were chosen by the closest ruler more often then not. Them crowning emperors weren’t a sign of authority but subservience, lol. When popes chose to oppose secular rulers, they either changed their minds or there were new pope.

Agreed on most of the points. True, church provided some legitimacy not all of it and not even majority, secular rulers had a lot of power over local clergy due to many factors and by the 10th century rulers tried to usurp church completely (e.g. emperor named new pope after old one dies). Bishops literally sworn fealty to HR emperor, and in some places monarch chose or at least had ability to choose who will become abbot or bishop or whatever.

Are you unable to accept being wrong?

This is exactly how it is and was used when talking about middle ages. There were secular and religious power, secular and religious courts, and in religious courts church only held authority in spiritual and religous matters. Exceptions to these rules are prince-bishops in HRE and other such examples (papal states) where bishops or pope were civil rulers of secular prinicpalities/states.

It is obvious that right now absolute majority lives better then ever before.

Yet there is a belief among people that everything was green and natural, and sweet before evil industrialization that stole our souls. Pure propaganda from rich assholes that salivate at the thoughts of neo-feudal system.

Secular means worldly, sorry.

Secular means that the state is neutral to the church

It does not. dictionary, and yes Henry VIII is a great example of what I’m talking about, when he didn’t get what he wanted he just changed the rules. Also he doesn’t belong to middle ages in any way or form, lol.

You really misunderstand who was at the top (it’s not clergy), this doesn’t exclude faith from equation, it’s just they were in most places under secular authority, not vice versa.

Church was a limit to secular athority, not the authority itself, in most places.

R-r-right, and monarchs were part of the clergy or head of church (except eastern roman empire ofc)?

Also why would church need to play by laws set up by local authorities if they were all under the rule of the church?