If it makes you feel any better she doesn’t get that pension https://fullfact.org/online/liz-truss-annual-allowance/
If it makes you feel any better she doesn’t get that pension https://fullfact.org/online/liz-truss-annual-allowance/
Only if you got 10 points for the ear
Sunderland?
Will it work on the steam deck?
The presenter focuses on argument 1 because he says the other points are “obviously correct” and therefore moral. Imo that’s flawed.
Hunger disease etc are part of a natural cycle which controls population and ecosystem balance.
Luxuries are of no significance is not obviously true. Our economic system means that purchasing items of “no moral significance” feeds into a system which supports livelihoods and, in a functional government, provides welfare and health care to populations.
There are multiple areas where money could be focused instead of Oxfam etc which could be seen as moral- R&D, luxuries as per 3
(It might just be that I don’t like philosophy)
Half the sentence of people who planned an environmental protest