minus-squareeh@nerdbin.socialOPtoLinux@lemmy.ml•Question: Is btrfs's compress-force=zstd compatible with x-systemd.automount?linkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoAll of these are “root” mounts. I don’t explicitly mount any subvolumes (they get “implicitly” mounted as folders though) linkfedilink
eh@nerdbin.social to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoQuestion: Is btrfs's compress-force=zstd compatible with x-systemd.automount?plus-squaremessage-squaremessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up116arrow-down11
arrow-up115arrow-down1message-squareQuestion: Is btrfs's compress-force=zstd compatible with x-systemd.automount?plus-squareeh@nerdbin.social to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-squareeh@nerdbin.socialtoLinux@lemmy.ml•Anyone else starting to favor Flatpak over native packages?linkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 years agoJust let some bees loose on your system for a while and they’ll sort that out. Also depending on how good your CPU is btrfs compression would also save a fair bit. AFAIK shared libraries are pretty well compressible. linkfedilink
All of these are “root” mounts. I don’t explicitly mount any subvolumes (they get “implicitly” mounted as folders though)