I get accused of being a bot all the time now because I still enjoy writing long-form posts and, y’know, contributing what I can to the state of human knowledge, or what remains of it anyway. I can’t blame people for being defensive about it. It’s the AIs themselves I’m offended by, they’re the ones doing wrong. We’re all just trying to cope with the avalanche of unverified garbage they’re putting out. It’s digital pollution.
Piefed connects them and shows you comments from other communities on other instances.
I wish you were right. I don’t mind governments and political parties who aren’t fascist. Democratic socialists and responsible environmentalists can AI-pump their ideology all they like and it’s not going to do much harm to civilization. But if they are doing it at all, they’re not doing it anywhere near the level that fascists and kleptocrats are. The latter benefit from radical change, and they are using AI to achieve that.
I think we can all agree it’s probably a bad idea.
Does that mean you shouldn’t? Maybe. But maybe not. Sometimes it’s fun to do something “wrong”, because you want to, and maybe you’ll really enjoy it anyway. Maybe you’ll learn a lot about why it’s a bad idea, and maybe you’ll find those learnings enrich your life and give you stories to tell. I’m not trying to recommend this at all, I’m just saying you should consider it from all angles and outcomes before you make a decision, especially if this is something he really wants to do for whatever reason. Life is for living, it’s not for making a series of optimal choices to result in the highest score. Experiences, both good and bad, are their own reward. And as long as nobody’s going to get hurt, and you go into it with your eyes open and an understanding of the risks and potential downfalls, and do what you can to mitigate and protect against them as much as you can, maybe it’s something you can try.
If it’s really something you’re not comfortable with, and he is, well then you two are going to have to have a long and hard talk about it and come to some mutually agreeable compromise. But even if it is objectively a bad idea, you also need to think about whether he’s just naive and is going to hate it, or whether it’s going to make him happy that he tried it, and whether it’s an experience he needs to have in his life. Meanwhile, is it going to cause you resentment if you go there and hate it and he loves it? Will he listen to you if you decide you really do hate it and don’t want to continue?
That’s not something anyone can answer for you, but it has little to do with whether it’s a bad idea and much more to do with what both of you want out of life.
and why they treat their drivers like subhuman robots already.
No nobody ever has to admit anything, they just have to be able to be plausibly implicated and plausible deniability is achieved.
I would absolutely and unironically fly this flag, although to be even more inclusive it also needs an alpha layer. Perhaps it should be a cube? Actually even that might not be inclusive enough, we need more dimensions. BRB I need to figure out how to attach a tesseract to my flagpole, I guess I’ll need some kind of gordian knot?
Mathematically right, the best kind of right.
It works: You can tell the real humans because they’ll be the only ones unwilling to do this invasive bullshit. The bots will just come up with something fake to scan and carry on as they always have.
It’s actually low-key brilliant. Start a gold rush, when you realize the gold isn’t actually there, pivot to selling shovels and keep hyping the gold rush. Fools and their money are soon parted, and there seem to be an endless supply of them.
xmpp is still the best, nobody’s ever going to change my mind. jabber 4 lyfe!
The French figured out how to solve that particular problem hundreds of years ago. Guillotines are efficient and reusable.