This is why they want to label antifa a “Terrorist Organization” despite the fact that anyone not rooting for the Fascist boot on their face would qualify as a ‘member’.
Besides, sequestered migrants will make better slaves stateside when all of our yearly produce starts to rot on the vine…
The last few Amber alerts I’ve gotten required an app Formerly known as Twitter account to get any additional details…
That’s what happens when you have an economic system built to reward greedy sociopaths.
1: Labor & Equipment.
2: Tesla owners don’t necessarily own the Charging stations.
3: They are icing wire cutters to remove the cables, destroying the cable in the process.
Hey, that Tardigrade is doing his best, okay!
So I guess all of those unsupervised PPP loans that were forgiven were a nice feather in the Democratic hat, then, huh?
I’ve heard that done Tesla models have laminate glass on the doors, like they make the windshield, making most glass breakers ineffective.
They only would have ‘broken the law’ in this case if they tried to sell it as their own original work, which it isn’t, and that is what the prompt writer in the op is trying to do.
Before YouTube’s switch to “your going to watch 6 ads before the video starts, and you are going to like it,” schtick, I always enjoyed getting to skip the ad before they managed to tell me what the product even was.
Treet Stacos
Saco Talad
Tai Chea
Bothered Smurrito
Mry Dartini
St-Bone Teak
Steef Broganoff
Panilla Vudding
Cocolate Chake
Tinnamon Coast
It doesn’t need to be an animated visual to be distracting or NSFW…
That’s a lot of faith that the ads would be SFW, let alone not distracting.
Not only that, but then they go and blow half of their budget on adverts instead of R&D.
While, yes it is not copy and paste in the literal sense, it does still have the capacity to outright copy the style of an artist’s work that was used to train it.
If teaching another artist’s work is already frowned upon when trying to pass the trace off as one’s own work, then there’s little difference when a computer does it more convincingly.
Maybe a bit off tangent here, since I’m not even sure if this is strictly possible, but if a generative system was only trained off of, say, only Picasso’s work, would you be able to pass the outputs off as Picasso pieces? Or would they be considered the work of the person writing a prompt or built the AI? What if the artist wasn’t Picasso but someone still alive, would they get a cut of the profits?
The art isn’t being made btw so much as being copy and pasted in a way that might convince you it was new.
Since the AI cannot create a new style or genre on its own, without source material that already exists to train it, and that source material is often scraped up off of databases, often against the will and intent of the original creators, it is seen as theft.
Especially if the artists were in no way compensated.
My trackball mice have had parts deteriorate at around the two year mark before. After this one breaks, usually the scrollwheel or the left click key, I’m switching to an opensource trackball system.
Especially when one of the loudest religions actively want to doom the world so that their sky daddy can show everyone else how right they were this whole time…
I haven’t been able to play much lately due to work, but I did manage to squeeze in some time to 100% Digseum.
I’ve loved the little genre of 'dig up buried artifacts ’ since it was a mini game back in Pokemon Diamond & Pearl, so it was nice to see again.