Let’s hope there’s a bunch so they stay busy fighting each other for it, instead of other people.

Activity

The real solution is making the average wage go up. Significantly. Which puts more money into the program overall.

With so much money having been shifted away from the average worker and Into the pockets of people who hit the FICA cap in their first paycheck of the year, over the last few decades, it was bound to have issues.

We had these in the US, too. They were called company towns and they were extremely abusive.

Those people who say that are just trying to justify their own hatred/bigotry/war crimes.

He’s wrong for calling it a bin. Gross.

Their games were an advertisement for their game engine. Cryengine

You literally stormed in here to start raging… About something you later admit you have zero knowledge of.

Just like that “tiny community” that owns a large portion of our media and control all 3 branches of gov…

This question was about NATIVE LINUX ONLY games. Not just supporting it…

It’s still an argument, given that this historically wasn’t the case. And Mac used to have a bigger share of the pie. Do they even make Mac only games anymore?

But those numbers pretty much prove my point. Unless you’re already set up to be making games specific to a system, there’s no point in starting from scratch to only name something for 1-2% of the market.

If the least used operating system. Why limit your audience to such a small niche to begin with? Game development isn’t cheap. You tend to not want to lock out your chances of recouping that by blocking 90% of potential players

Hyperlink which went to a different article. Do you not understand how the Internet works? Don’t act like you weren’t wrong when you failed to clarify properly. That’s not on me

So…not in the article, but in a completely different linked article. Got it

The word laser does not appear once in this article.

Where’s it say they used a laser to transfer the information? This sounded like quantum entanglement was being demonstrated here

You keep acting like votes mean permission to break the law. Our that people who generally don’t pay attention to politics would be fine with someone they didn’t vote for it against breaking the law. This is a dipshit logical stance to take. So pretending you’re not the store one here when you try to say idiotic shit like this. Like did you think this through in your head?

Yes, I keep bringing it up because you boot lickers love to ignore the context of everything you argue about. Abstraction is the only chance you have at winning an argument against such an obviously one sided discussion.

I shouldn’t be surprised by your lack of reading comprehension. I’m not really sure what you’re even responding to, none of it lines up with anything I just said.

And again, telling you he’s going to break the law doesn’t mean he’s allowed to break the law even if he is voted in after saying it.

This is that half of America is functionally illiterate nonsense the rest of us have to deal with.

I have nothing to prove to some dumbass online. Believe me or not, it doesn’t stop you being wrong.

Lol. So do I. Along with over a decade in the field. Keep pretending you know shit.

Getting voted in is NOT permission to break the law.

He’s illegally bypassing Congress with his actions. Doesn’t matter if this is what your dumbass voted for, it’s not how this works.