Sorry but there are so much more things you have a way bigger impact on climate than website requires a little bit JavaScript.
Sorry but there are so much more things you have a way bigger impact on climate than website requires a little bit JavaScript.
I don’t really understand the outrage. The status quo is that companies didnt support it for years. So 99.9% won’t notice any change.
But a mail CLIENT is a Web App not a static documents site. If Wikipedia would require JS I would kind of understand it from a technical point.
But big corporation tries to reduce cost by shutting down scarcely used old service happens monthly.
Good thing they abandoned this. Rare case where consumer won. And this is getting more and more rare!
Sorry disagree with most stuff and I also don’t see what such a system would improve for the majority of people.
But let’s not argue anymore let’s just agree to disagree.
In theory. But then real life happens:
Macro things:
One of my favorite things said about crypto by famous german hacker Linus Neumann about crypto was something like: They where so obsessed with whether they could make digital money work, and the technical is super smart. But they forgot to think about if they should.
Wodka-W war schon immer der Hit aufm Dorffest…
In Europe good connected homes (basically cities) can have a ping of 10-20 ms. Most people won’t notice mich of a lav when they casually play on their couch.
Maybe also unpopular, but my standpoint on taxes is: The government is the one giving out the money in the first place. Every dollar comes from the Fed (exception some virtual money) like the monopoly bank just gives out money in the first place.
The point of taxes is to keep the economy working fairly. Like putting high taxes on something to discourage bad behavior, and the other way around. Also, it’s necessary to keep capitalism from evolving into feudalism, as money likes to accumulate on a few rich ones.
The second thought is what the government should with the money. Of course, they should do great and needed investments. Often times, this is not the case, but the root problems here are not taxes themselves. There is no alternative universe where the government is spending all money perfectly.
The real problem is the rich being able to evade taxes, and they frame taxes as something unfair. Additionally, not rich people pay far too much in taxes.
Inflation kommt durch Angebot / Nachfrage-Schocks. Das kann aus mehr Geld im Umlauf resultieren, muss es aber nicht.
Wenn der Staat Geld schöpft, um damit alle Handwerker im Land mit Aufträgen zu versorgen, bekämen wir Inflation. Es gäbe ein zu knappes Angebot an Handwerkern (weil die Privatwirtschaft die ja auch noch braucht) und die können dann die Preise massiv anheben. Wenn der Staat Geld schöpft, um arbeitslosen Künstlern ihre Arbeit zu finanzieren, ändert das nichts, was Angebot/Nachfrage angeht.
Geld wird z. B. auch geschöpft, wenn eine Bank einen Kredit vergibt. Die Märkte wachsen auch stetig seit langer Zeit was zu mehr Wert und Geld führt. Wenn die mehr Geldmenge = Inflation Theorie stimmen würde, hätten wir seit Langem konstant steigende Inflation.
Dann antworte doch mit “ja steht auch auf dem Plakat”. Dann weiß sofort jeder, was gemeint ist.
Self-hosted instance of Yarr (https://github.com/nkanaev/yarr).
I think this is not the way.
It’s like with dental care. The solution is not to don’t care and think that someday technology will fix it. Instead you should brush regularly, don’t eat much sugar and visit the dentist now and then. It’s prevention.
We currently don’t have any technology that will save us and time is running out. Why bet on a tech wonder that needs to be mass ready in no time?
Weiß jemand, ob ich dafür auf Deutsch schreiben muss? Mein Blog ist auf Englisch…
Sehr schön, hat etwas von Kevin Spacey: https://images.app.goo.gl/xHMzkdSfCWirU8Ma7