• macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    If that is true, then why are deb packages provided by Canonical for Ubuntu dummied out?

    Canonical FORCES you to use snaps, there is no other way to look at this.

    • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They do not prevent you from adding repos and installing from those. They don’t even try to make it slightly more difficult to do so than it was before. Microsoft force you to use edge. Cannot really disable it. Can’t remove it. Can’t simply switch away from it. See the difference?

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I haven’t kept up with Edge Shenanigans since I no longer use Windows, but the last time I used it I had no issues using Firefox instead of Edge.

        Yeah sure you can add repositories to replace Canonical Sources to evade those dummied out packages, but you really really shouldn’t need to do that in the first place.

        So the only difference is: MS enforcement is more stringent than Canonical, but they both force their respective ways onto the user (which may or may not versed enough to actually add/remove apt repositories).

        • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          you can install firefox, but even if you click ‘make firefox my default browser’, it won’t. It will open the settings, wait a second and then show you another button. Clicking that will do what you wanted - for web links. Pdf files? Html files? Searches from the start menu? Still all open edge.

          On ubuntu it takes maybe a minute to remove the firefox snap, add the mozilla repo and install from there. Those dummie packages are more for convenience than anything nefarious. I agree that snaps have been made unavoidable if you’re not paying attention, but I disagree that it’s a bad thing. Ubuntu is migrating from .debs to snaps, so it makes sense that those become ever more prominant.

          • macniel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Oh so that’s still a thing that you need to set every file extensions and protocol separately to the other browser. Yeah that is stupid.

            And it only takes a minute on Ubuntu if you Know what you are doing. The regular user probably only see that their applications are slow to start and need to search the internet why, if they care at all.

            And why is that? Because Canonical doesn’t tell you that you installed a snap, Microsoft is “honest” enough and tells you that they are shitty and want you to use Edge.

            • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              They technically do tell you, even in the graphical software store. And the speed difference between snaps and debs has been largely nullified by now.

    • lengau@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Canonical provides transitional packages for packages that they’ve decided to provide as snaps. They’re not forcing anyone to use snaps, they’re saying “if you want the default we provide you, we’re providing you with a snap.” KDE Neon (my current distro, which is downstream of Ubuntu) has decided that they want to use the deb packages from packages.mozilla.org, so they provide an override. If you want to use the deb from packages.mozilla.org, you could grab KDE Neon’s repository deb and install that, or just set up the mozilla repository and use the same pin file they already have.

      This is like saying “Debian FORCES you to use libav” Debian moved from ffmpeg to libav for a while. No, they provided libav and made transitional packages for this drop-in replacement. Some people didn’t like that and made their own ffmpeg repos, and the process for using their separate ffmpeg rather than Debian’s transitional packages was the same as the process for using Firefox from a different repository. (I was one of the people used some third-party ffmpeg repositories, and I was glad when they switched back to ffmpeg and provided libav to ffmpeg transitional packages.)

      Does the fact that the Ubuntu repositories don’t contain Keysmith mean “Ubuntu PROHIBITS you from using Keysmith?”

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Canonical provides transitional packages for packages that they’ve decided to provide as snaps. They’re not forcing anyone to use snaps, they’re saying “if you want the default we provide you, we’re providing you with a snap.”

        Uhm… and why does the user have to transition to snaps? Why does Canonical provide those transitional packages while there are perfectly valid debs for the same thing? Certainly not because they have a vested interest in forcing it right?

        you instantly refute yourself, kudos!

        • lengau@midwest.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Uhm… and why does the user have to transition to snaps?

          They don’t. But Canonical will no longer be providing debs in primary Ubuntu repositories, so those transitional packages exist so that users don’t wind up with an abandoned, old version of Firefox.

          Why does Canonical provide those transitional packages while there are perfectly valid debs for the same thing?

          For the same reason neither Ubuntu nor Debian provide debs for Google Chrome, despite Google having an official apt repository? Those debs exist in somebody else’s apt repository. If you want to add that apt repository, you’re welcome to. But those external packages aren’t part of the system they provide.

          you instantly refute yourself, kudos!

          Your unwillingness to accept what I’m saying doesn’t make what I’m saying contradictory.

          • macniel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            They don’t. But Canonical will no longer be providing debs in primary Ubuntu repositories

            so they are forcing the users to adopt snaps.

            • lengau@midwest.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              If I were giving you €50/month, and then one day I decided to give you USD$55 instead, am I “forcing” you to accept US currency? No, I’m choosing to give you something I don’t have to give you in the first place in a different form. You can always reject my offer. You can ask someone else to give you €50/month.

              They’re choosing how they want to provide Firefox. If anyone else wants to provide Firefox differently, Canonical isn’t stopping them. In fact, Canonical literally hosts and does the builds for an unofficial Firefox repo with their free Launchpad service.

              Distributions decide what they want to package and how to package it all the time. Pretty much every time, someone is upset. But that upset is generally based on an unreasonable sense of entitlement.

              • macniel@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                If I were giving you €50/month, and then one day I decided to give you USD$55 instead, am I “forcing” you to accept US currency?

                Yes, you are literally forcing me to accept your dollarinos, which, unless I exchange them MYSELF, are USELESS!

                You provided me, until an arbitrary cutoff day, always the negotiated currency (deb package) but then you, out of the blue, decide to change it to your currency (snap package).

                If Canonical want to do their own package, why don´t they just make a new branch and ditch Debian all together? I am not aware of ANY downstream distribution to ditch their upstream’s package format, except Ubuntu. Well and those that lie underneath Ubuntu and ditch snap for the super upstream’s (debian) package format.

                You can always reject my offer. You can ask someone else to give you €50/month.

                so either suck it up to Canonical, or go to another distribution provider? Thats your solution to your not perceived enforcement of snap?

                • lengau@midwest.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Yes, you are literally forcing me to accept your dollarinos, which, unless I exchange them MYSELF, are USELESS!

                  Hold on, have I fallen for Poe’s law?

                  • macniel@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    That’s your pejorative to believe that, yet I am quite sincere when it comes to the fact that Canonical forces Snap on Ubuntu Users when debs were totally fine as other Debian derivatives use them with no issues.

                    And as you can see on other comments I’m not alone with that stance.