• someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s concerning that you think the absence of a device is comparable to the presence of a action, in this case hitting.

    • abraxas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s concerning that you think the absence of a device is comparable to the presence of a action, in this case hitting.

      I’m genuinely lost on how you think the only variable here is whether something is being banned or being encouraged. Or should I say, it’s “concerning”. Did you have a smartphone in school?

      • someguy3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fyi when you resort to trying to mock people, they won’t want to talk to you.

        • abraxas@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hmm. I’m curious about this. I repeated the words you used because I thought it was appropriate to do so. Were you resorting to trying to mock me in the first place?

          If so, then “glass houses” and all that. If not, then please don’t take my reply as mocking. I genuinely mean it. And I am genuinely curious if you had smartphones in school. We didn’t have them when I grew up.