• dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m curious why the separation between these still exists, because a bunch of distributions symlink all of these to /usr/bin either way

    • uis@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Think about booting over network. Or having /usr on another drive. Including even network drive. Think about dumb terminals(wrong cetury) thin clients. For example they can use small disk to quickly boot wihout downloading kernel and initramfs and use NFS for /usr and /home.

        • uis@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          True, network boot is not best example. Shared /usr is much better one. For example if you are school that wants to buy 100 thin clients for very cheap.

    • rotopenguin@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      It exists because, long ago in a galaxy far far away, a sysadmin ran out of space on a drive. The system was split between two 10MB(?) drives, one was / and one was mounted at /usr, for User data. They moved some of the programs to a folder for a dummy user, /usr/bin, and put that in everybody’s PATH.

      Everybody kept on doing things that way ever since. Social momentum is funny that way.