• Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Maybe it’s time to admit that maybe Dark Matter doesn’t exist, and we need a different hypothesis to explain the universe?

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Other than the fact that it/some of it was probably detected in 2023 and all the models do mostly work. Plus the LHC proved the existence of the Higgs Boson.

    • Ixsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Neutrinos are an unknown science that we still know so very little about. There are hypotheses that say neutrinos could be the missing dark matter, but they are fringe. Once we have a reliable way of detecting them it would unlock all sorts of secrets of the very early universe - think microwave background radiation except with neutrinos.

    • erin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That seems a bit silly considering how much evidence we have for it. That’s an awful lot of work to throw away for no great reason.

        • erin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s not my job to educate you on what could be a brief Google search. Stop being such a cynic. The gravitational lens distortion of distant galaxies is basically impossible without dark matter. Not to parrot the mantra of conspiracy theorists and cultists, but do your own research.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            The gravitational lens distortion of distant galaxies is basically impossible without dark matter.

            … using our current model of the Universe.

            Dark matter, and dark energy in particular, were introduced to make existing models fit the data.

            • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              And we will keep using it until we have a better model

              Which we don’t, for that matter

              You’re speaking as if scientists aren’t constantly trying to create new, better models that fit the data better.

              • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I have no problem with the scientists searching for better models.

                It’s the scientists talking about dark matter like it’s as established as an electron whereas dark matter and energy is more like aether.

                The entire evidence for dark matter (and dark energy) has been generated by matching data to models we are sure are incorrect (quantum gravity).

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Seriously though.

      I’m no great physicist, but dark matter and dark energy sound like the ether of our times.

      Hypothetical constructs to pluck the holes of misunderstanding the Universe.