• ChexMax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I hear you but it’s far more likely for a woman to track her own period than for a nearby man to track it. You’re the reason this professor felt the need to give this example. Because men assume all progress and intellectual pursuits were obviously sought by men. You guys think it’s the automatic default, and even the suggestion that a woman might have accomplished something is met with, “hey! It could have been a man!”

    • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      There’s some faulty reasoning here.
      Parent comment challenges the assumption that the marks were made by a female, and you say “you’re the reason the professor felt the need to give this example”, although the example was given in order to challenge assumptions of gender.
      OP is actually learning from the example if anything, since they are challenging gender assumptions.
      On top of that, your use of “you guys”, and your generalisations about men are evidence of the exact type of biased thinking this example is trying to challenge.