According to a recent tweet shared by AI enthusiast Nick St. Pierre, the alleged theft occurred last Saturday. It is claimed that employees from Stability AI infiltrated Midjourney’s database and stole all prompt and image pairs, an action that also caused a 24-hour outage. In response, MJ reportedly banned all Stable Diffusion developers from its services, a move supposedly disclosed internally within the company on Wednesday.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    8 months ago

    Live by the sword, die by the sword.

    AI generated images are not, and should not be considered copyright able, and they don’t own the right to the image they generated, as I understand it.

    Otherwise, Midjourney are certainly very welcome to start paying royalties to certain popular celebrities whose images they are profiting off of. You can’t have it both ways.

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Iirc the only precedent we have is that the AI algorithm itself cannot hold the copyright to what it creates, as one artist wanted it to be. Basically the same thing as the famous monkey selfie.

      If the copyright of a generated image can be claimed by the creator of the algorithm, or the user who wrote the prompt, and how much human effort is required for it is still unknown.

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        The code is obviously protected by copyright. Not sure why anyone would question that?

        If the prompt is protected, then the output image will be too (and by the same owner). I suspect it depends on how detailed the prompt is (just like a tweet might not be eligible for copyright, unless it’s a particularly creative joke/haiku/etc).