• LewdBoidens@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally use PopOS, I got a need to game, if I really wanna tinker it’s always there if I want to. But I need an entertainment OS for my living room not a pet project.

    • MirranCrusader@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      PopOS gaming was a shit show for me, steam wouldn’t work and installing non free drivers borked my system like it was Ubuntu 12.04. I honestly don’t have any idea what PopOS does that others don’t for gaming, steam/wine/lutris/bottles are distribution agnostic. I’ve only ever heard people say PopOS for gaming but never seen anything showing why it’s better.

      Full disclosure this was a while ago and I’ve gone separate ways with Debian and derivatives for now.

      • puppy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What are you using now?

        What PopOS’ did different was not any of the software you mentioned. It was proprietary NVIDIA drivers. They shipped them with the ISO and put it front and center.

    • DeflectedBullhorn@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, currently I’m having less trouble using Arch to game than I was with anything else. I think the big thing is that Aech has a rapid release of updates, and the Steamdeck is based on Arch.

      If you want those benefits without a lot of the annoying complexity during setup, there is always EndeavorOS. It’s pretty close to a basic Arch install, but it holds your hand a lot more.