• dartanjinn@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    TL;DR: ChromeOS is Linux but it’s not Linux but it’s a Linux so count it as a Linux but not Linux. Half.

      • Phrodo_00@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        As far as I know, ChromeOS is also GNU/Linux (It uses full glibc, includes gnu utils and bash), so not so much.

        • NaN@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          They mention this in the article.

          In fact, they never say it’s not Linux. The summary would be more like: “ChromeOS should be counted among desktop Linux, because it has the same basis as any other GNU/Linux distribution, unlike Android. Here are the dumb reasons I think people would argue against this.”

        • fulano@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Such definitionsaree becoming more and more complicated. I think we should standardize a name for the family of systems we use, or it will become uglier and uglier.

          Recently, I had to wrote am academic work in the area, and an entire section was dedicated to explaining this controversy and defining what kind of system I was talking about, so that the work is reproducible.

      • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You see sometimes Linux is not Linux and sometimes it is. Naturally, we can’t count non-Linux as Linux but sometimes we can count Linux as non-Linux.