• cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m curious as to whether the router manufacturer included a back door or if the FBI used the same exploit that was used to infect the routers in the first place.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      probably the latter, since all of these routers were unpatched, out-of-date routers, and that’s how they were exploited in the first place.

      however, the article specifically states that the court documents are all redacted when it comes to the details

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not entirely uncommon for the latter to happen. Some greyhats have done similar things to clear out botnets in the past. It still counts as unauthorized access to a system though so most avoid doing so even if the intended result is beneficial

    • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      The U.S. has a very robust hacking capability, we just don’t advertise it and we concentrate on shutting down or infiltrating critical infrastructure in times of war or espionage.

      Instead of hacking China to steal industrial secrets, we hack them to see if we could say open or close all the floodgates at the 3 Gorges Damn… China hacks us to steal state and industrial secrets, though they are now starting to focus on infrastructure.