fastandcurious@lemmy.world to AnarchyChess@sopuli.xyz · 1 year agoHow does this move make sense?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up13arrow-down1imageHow does this move make sense?lemmy.worldfastandcurious@lemmy.world to AnarchyChess@sopuli.xyz · 1 year agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareGamma@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-21 year agoIf you’re looking for legitimate advice, you’re in the wrong community. Anarchychess is for chess memes. That said, what my noob brain sees: it attacks white’s c pawn it activates black’s queen it prevents Qa4+, allowing black to castle Edit: Qa4, not Qh4
minus-squaremegaman@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYea, white doesn’t have any way, i dont think, of dedending thay C pawn, so black gets it next turn
minus-squareblubton@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoOn top of that it avoids Bg5, pinning the horsey, which could otherwise maybe be annoying. Also, I thing you meant Qa4+ instead of Qh4+, which is the anarchychess idea in this position for white.
If you’re looking for legitimate advice, you’re in the wrong community. Anarchychess is for chess memes.
That said, what my noob brain sees:
Edit: Qa4, not Qh4
Yea, white doesn’t have any way, i dont think, of dedending thay C pawn, so black gets it next turn
On top of that it avoids Bg5, pinning the horsey, which could otherwise maybe be annoying. Also, I thing you meant Qa4+ instead of Qh4+, which is the anarchychess idea in this position for white.