• BlueBockser@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Other economic systems aren’t exactly protective of the environment either though, so I don’t really get your point.

    • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Other economic systems don’t incentivise companies to produce trash products that break quickly to keep the customer coming back, or to use non-recyclable materials because they cost 3 cents less.

      • NAK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Which economic system, in your opinion, would produce the highest quality products? And you can use whatever definition of quality you like

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The Six Nations managed to keep their economic system functioning without a hiccup for at least 15,000 to 25,000 years. That one seems to work.

          • NAK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ok. Let’s switch to six nations.

            That definitely answers my question

              • NAK@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                When the response to my question of “what do you think is better” is an esoteric shout out to a culture that’s been dead for thousands of years, that isn’t even in the first page of Google results for “six nations” yeah. You’re right. It’s not a good faith argument

                  • NAK@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Because that’s a thing capitalism is great at? If the connection between capitalism and ruthless efficiency and iteration isn’t apparent to whoever is reading this then it’s really not worth the conversation

      • BlueBockser@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh yes, they do. Corruption, unrealistic n-year plans and secrecy for example lead to defective products, poor quality and accidents. That’s exactly what happened in Chernobyl, and I don’t need to tell you how bad that was for the environment.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          What happened at Chernobyl was the politicians refusing to listen to the scientists. They were performing an experiment that the designers of the plant told them was exceedingly dangerous, and blew up their reactor. At least they did it unintentionally, unlike the Army Corps of Engineers.

          • BlueBockser@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            And why did “the politicians” refuse not to listen to “the scientists”? Part of the answer is definitely due to unrealistic n-year plans.

            Also, there were other factors at play such as secrecy around the danger of graphite-tipped control rods. The Soviets had discovered this danger already, but had kept it secret even from their nuclear engineers.

    • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They dont do planned obsolecence either.

      See, people?..this is what the Temecommunications Act gets you.