• idiomaddict@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t know what their cognitive processes are, but it seems unlikely they do. It still sounds perfectly normal to me to say the following:

    “Spider webs are designed to be safe for the spider, but still trap as much potential prey as possible.”

    Does that really hit your ear (eye) wrong?

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      yes. i would talk about the evolutionary pressures that have shaped the behavior of the organism. i wouldn’t impart volition to them.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          “spiders have evolved to produce webs. evolutionary pressures have favored species which produce webs that are safe for the organism and effective at trapping enough prey to maintain the life and reproductive cycles of the organism.”

          • idiomaddict@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            That feels much more formal to me. Definitely not incorrect, but not how I’d explain it casually to someone.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              devoid of context, your phrasing might be fine. in this context, precision is important for us to focus on the actual issue.

              • idiomaddict@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I don’t really think “milk customized for a calf” makes much of a difference for the point OP was making. Sorry, if this was kind of a waste of time, I just love that milk changes composition based on the baby’s situation and then got really interested in the linguistic limits of “design.”