You know, like McDowells. I don’t actually care what color my shells are. There are principals involved. Principalities!

  • MrVilliam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Okay, but now do housing and groceries and you’ll see why people don’t have extra money laying around for another Nintendo and its Mario kart.

    Economics is significantly more complicated than a bar graph of inflation-adjusted video game price tags lol. Hell, even just value of each game in their respective release time period is more complicated than that. I doubt there’s anything unique to this new game (other racing games have done the open world thing several times starting like 15 years ago), but the kart racer genre itself was new back in the 90s.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is a valuable way of seeing how prices have changed in different ways for different categories, just since 2000.

        • theolodis@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Looking up the source, they state: “At the turn of the century, a flat screen TV would cost around 17% of the median income of the time ($42,148). In the early aughts though, prices began to fall quickly. Today, a new TV will cost less than 1% of the U.S. median income ($54,132).”

          So a Flat screen TV used to cost around $7165, and does now cost around $541, which is about 7.5% of the original value. That means a deflation by 92.5%.