• orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    4 天前

    I’ve been a programmer for around 20 years now and I can tell you with 100% confidence that this is going to be an absolute fucking disaster. I’ve built project features—not even full projects—that took months. Hell, we launch one on Monday. This would realistically take years, and after seeing how garbage the DOGE site was built, I have zero confidence in the incel team Elon scraped off his Steam friends list.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 天前

      Yeah, the ideal process is something like this:

      1. Write a bunch of automated tests
      2. Rewrite a chunk that’s well tested
      3. Go to 1 until the project is done

      I would budget a couple years. Even a smaller codebase would take more than a couple months.

      • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 天前

        Yeah, this. They need this to be completely test-driven. Build a foundation and build out/finalize in pieces. If they had an actual dev team that knew what they were doing, someone would set them straight. They also need a ton of time to gain an understanding of what every part of the existing codebase is doing.