• yianiris@kafeneio.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    @Max_P @yote_zip

    A file system and a raid setup all in one with facebook’s code for de-/compression … yet another piece of software that tries to do the work for several others.

    ext4 will rarely have extreme loads unless all you do is backup and mirroring. For more accurate data read/write and better checks use xfs and external journaling. On M2 it is by far the fastest solution and far more secure than ext.

    • yianiris@kafeneio.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @Max_P @yote_zip

      On magnetic disk there is physical location for each bit of data written, for ssd it is all virtual space handled by internal software simulating a magnetic drive. The variation from disk to disk is much higher than the sensitivity of the fs.

      You want accuracy and reliability of data storage, use HDD and Raid!

      • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        RAID doesn’t checksum and heal the rotten data. It’s game over before you even have a filesystem on top of it, because said filesystem can’t directly access the underlying disks because of the RAID layer.

        Errors will occur, and RAID has no way of handling it. You have a RAID1, disk 1 says it’s a 0, disk 2 says it’s a 1. Who’s right? RAID can’t tell, btrfs and ZFS can. RAID won’t even notice there’s a couple flipped bits, it’ll just pass them along. ZFS will just retry the read on both disks, pick the block that matches the checksum, and write the correct data back on the other disk. That’s why people with lots of data loves ZFS and RAIDZ.

        The solution isn’t more reliable hardware, the solution software that can tell you and recover from your failing hardware.