octopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoFacepalm on multiple levelslemmy.mlimagemessage-square137fedilinkarrow-up1959arrow-down112cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1947arrow-down1imageFacepalm on multiple levelslemmy.mloctopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square137fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareoctopus_ink@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down1·1 day agoI think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
minus-squareCyrus Draegur@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down1·1 day agoExactly. “they can’t do that that’s illegal” Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES
I think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
Exactly.
“they can’t do that that’s illegal”
Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES