I mean… I kinda get it, but nowadays it’s starting to get absurd.

(EDIT: This was supposed to be a “blow air out my nose and get on with my life” meme…)

  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Been on xiaohongshu for a while now and the chinese netizens I interacted with were nothing but kind to foreigners even when we treated them like shit.

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Many of them use VPNs to get around firewalls and I speak with them aswell on other platforms. I am learning mandarin and it is quite helpful. I don’t like everypart of their society, there is still some of misogyny and homophobia that makes me uncomfortable but I have seen worse here. The people of xiaohongshu are actually making great strides to combat this and I applaud them. I have probably spoken candidly with people from every major city. What makes you think people without global internet are inherently more reactionary. Wouldn’t their views be reflected in the people that have that access as well? If it is so nation wide?

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Cool.

          I’m glad their lives aren’t hell under their fascist regime.

          Most of the time when a country tries to make an ethnostate the main race get to live pretty good lives.

          • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Wild that you actually think China is a Han ethnostate. Are you the type to believe they are sterilizing their minorities?

            • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Cool, I didn’t even say Han and yet you knew what I meant.

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_Chinese#:~:text=The Han Chinese%2C alternatively the,75%25 of the country’s population.

              The Han Chinese represent 91.11% of the population in China

              There are long running documented campaigns of cultural erasure of China’s minority groups. It’s no shocker that a country with billions of people they would use ethnic clensing to maintain social stability.

              • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                I said Han because I am well aware that is the ethnic majority in China lmao. I’d love to see your sources for the ethnic cleansing.

                The ottomans had a stupid amount of ethnic minorities and managed to last for centuries. Ethnic and cultural diversity does not necessarily mean instability. Xinjiang and Tibet are autonomous regions for a reason.

                  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    23 hours ago

                    I literally did not argue for an ethno state but ok

                    please see my other commment in thisn post about how much of that is bullshit. you do know wikipedia is primarily western and is going to reflect the biases of westerners and the claims of western governments right? As someone who is studying history in an official capacity as we speak it is laughable that you would use it as a source. it is legitimately especially egregious that you would use a western non-primary source to back up western claims about their largest geo-political enemy.