• boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 months ago

    there’s been a lot of concern that Snapdragon X-based PCs might be locked down to Windows, and while it remains unclear just how easy it will be to install a GNU/Linux distribution on a Snapdragon X PC that ships with Windows, it’s nice to know that at least one company is looking to release a model that will come with Linux pre-installed.

    What does that mean? Are they not using UEFI?

    I just hope they use Coreboot.

    Btw are there any FOSS Coreboot compatible ARM Chromebooks worth looking at?

      • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not true. For example Libreboot currently supports 2 ARM laptops. The way I understand it is that Libreboot uses U-boot as an extra bootloader, kinda like you would run GRUB after UEFI. U-boot can also just work on it’s own and Coreboot ARM devices are rather the exception.

        • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’d argue chain loading coreboot/libreboot from u-boot isn’t really “supporting it” as much as it’s just extending it, but fair enough. In the end it’s still using u-boot with extra steps.

      • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        I never understood why booting arm is such a pain. I mean I get that the current situation is that it is a pain but I don’t get why this is the situation.

        • qaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Mobile devices usually run iOS or Android which have their own dedicated boot loader. Embedded devices usually just boot directly into the main storage.

          • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Especially with android I don’t get it. Every vendor has to maintain their own boot loader and modify the aosp code just to get it to boot on their devices. Is it just to avoid people slapping their own os on their phones?

        • Balder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think UEFI was something that took a while to be standardized and mostly because of Intel’s influence over it, while ARM seems more diverse both in manufacturers and types of devices. When things are decentralized it becomes much more difficult to get everyone on board of something.

          • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I guess but bios was a thing way before uefi and while it apparently also was a pain because people implemented it differently it did work.

            Afaik the mein problem with arm is the discoverability of the hardware on the bus. For x86 it’s pretty dynamic but arm needs something called a device tree.

  • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 months ago

    Linux was ready for ARM years ago.

    Sad that we need to wait for Windows to get support first so manufacturers and chip makers start to care.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      i’m glad to know that tuxedo computers is doing it and now i know where my next purchase is going to be.

    • ylai@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Likely due to being a prototype. Production laptops from Tuxedo tend to have the “TUX” penguin in a circle logo on the Super key by default. They also have been offering custom engraved keyboard (even with the entire keyboard engraved from scratch to the customer’s specifications) as added service, so probably there will be suppliers or production facility to change the Super key.

      By the way, there was one YouTube channel that ended up ordering a laptop with Windings engraving from them: https://youtu.be/nidnvlt6lzw?t=186

  • Archaeopteryx@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nice. My next Laptop will be a MNT Reform, but if the performance of the Schenker/Tuxedo ARM laptop is right I wouldn’t be averse to buying one as well.

  • Pekka@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This looks great. That would be quite a powerful low-weight machine with long battery life. If they won’t be too expensive (and gaming works on them) I might get one. At least RuneLite seems to already support ARM64 on Linux and these chips also put more spotlight on ARM trough Windows on ARM.

    • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well you will VERY likely need FEX for “Gaming” (if you talk about x86_64 proprietary Windows software)

      I am sure Xonotic and others are already available on ARM Linux.

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nice. A lot of Linux laptops seem sold locked to the inferior ISO keyboard instead of ANSI.

    • exu@feditown.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Big ass enter is way better than the small one.
      You can’t change my mind.

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I always hit the slash instead and the short shift messes me up too. although I switched to grid aligned 1u keys for everything recently and other boards were put up for free for a month or so and anything unclaimed went to the electronics pile at the transfer station.

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m sure the future RSI from reaching your pinky that far from the home row will agree

      • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Okay, and? The person you replied to you is talking about ISO versus ANSI layouts… which define the rest of the keys on a keyboard. They were talking about QWERTY. So clearly there are other keyboard layouts that matter.

          • bitwolf@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            5 months ago

            It dictates the location and size of certain keys.

            For example the needlessly large enter key on ISO or the annoyingly small left shift key in ISO. You could very likely prefer ANSI as well.

              • herrvogel@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Keyboards have two layouts: a physical layout and a logical layout. The physical layout defines what the keyboard looks like, and the logical layout defines what signal each key sends to the computer. Qwerty is a logical layout, ISO and ANSI are physical layouts. Qwerty keyboards exist commonly in both ISO and ANSI layouts.