• ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For the user or the company? Assuming the user isn’t a moron with computers?

    Edit: guess im out of the loop as a contractor who generally only does BYOD with my linux machine

    • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both. The company puts shit on the user’s computer and the user may not meet the company’s security standards. It’s just a bad idea.

    • Bobert@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      For the company, and no one should ever assume for a moment that everyone has their guard up at all times and is infallible.

    • Contend6248@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If a user doesn’t understand that having complete control over every device in your network is essential, he’s being a complete moron with computers.

      You should do your work, not worrying about patching all the 128 tools you think you need, that’s other peoples job.